Fat, turkey vs Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked
Nutrition comparison per 100g serving
Macronutrient Comparison
| Nutrient | Fat, turkey | Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 900 kcal | 226 kcal | |
| Total Fat | 99.8g | 17.6g | |
| Saturated Fat | 29.4g | 6.2g | |
| Cholesterol | 102mg | 70mg | |
| Sodium | 0mg | 1200mg | |
| Total Carbohydrates | 0g | 3.9g | |
| Dietary Fiber | 0g | 0g | = |
| Sugars | 0g | 0g | = |
| Protein | 0g | 13.1g |
Vitamin Comparison
| Vitamin | Fat, turkey | Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 14.8mg |
| Vitamin D | 4.8mcg | 0mcg |
| Vitamin E | 2.9mg | 0mg |
Mineral Comparison
| Mineral | Fat, turkey | Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked |
|---|---|---|
| Iron | 0mg | 1.2mg |
| Selenium | 0.2mcg | 0mcg |
Zusammenfassung
Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked is lower in calories. Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked has more protein. Overall, Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked wins in 6 of 7 categories.
More comparisons with Fat, turkey
More comparisons with Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked
Nutritional Disclaimer
This content is for educational and informational purposes only. Nutritional values may vary based on preparation method, portion size, and product brand. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized dietary advice.
Data sources: USDA FoodData Central, Korea MFDS, Japan MEXT.