Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked vs Salami, cooked, turkey

Nutrition comparison per 100g serving

Macronutrient Comparison

Nutrient Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked Salami, cooked, turkey Winner
Calories 226 kcal 172 kcal
Total Fat 17.6g 9.2g
Saturated Fat 6.2g 2.8g
Cholesterol 70mg 76mg
Sodium 1200mg 1110mg
Total Carbohydrates 3.9g 1.6g
Dietary Fiber 0g 0.1g
Sugars 0g 1.1g
Protein 13.1g 19.2g

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked Salami, cooked, turkey
Vitamin A 0mcg 2mcg
Vitamin C 14.8mg 0mg
Vitamin D 0mcg 0.6mcg
Vitamin E 0mg 0.2mg
Vitamin K 0mcg 1.3mcg
Thiamin (B1) 0mg 0.4mg
Riboflavin (B2) 0mg 0.3mg
Niacin (B3) 0mg 4.0mg
Vitamin B6 0mg 0.4mg
Folate 0mcg 10mcg
Vitamin B12 0mcg 1.0mcg

Mineral Comparison

Mineral Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked Salami, cooked, turkey
Calcium 0mg 40mg
Iron 1.2mg 1.2mg
Magnesium 0mg 22mg
Phosphorus 0mg 266mg
Potassium 0mg 216mg
Zinc 0mg 2.3mg
Selenium 0mcg 26.4mcg

สรุป

Salami, cooked, turkey is lower in calories. Salami, cooked, turkey has more protein. Overall, Salami, cooked, turkey wins in 6 of 9 categories.

More comparisons with Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked

More comparisons with Salami, cooked, turkey

Nutritional Disclaimer

This content is for educational and informational purposes only. Nutritional values may vary based on preparation method, portion size, and product brand. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized dietary advice.

Data sources: USDA FoodData Central, Korea MFDS, Japan MEXT.

Compare Other Foods

vs