Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids vs Mangos, raw

Nutrition comparison per 100g serving

Macronutrient Comparison

Nutrient Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids Mangos, raw Winner
Calories 116 kcal 60 kcal
Total Fat 0.8g 0.4g
Saturated Fat 0.2g 0.1g
Cholesterol 30mg 0mg
Sodium 50mg 1mg
Total Carbohydrates 0g 15g
Dietary Fiber 0g 1.6g
Sugars 0g 13.7g
Protein 25.5g 0.8g

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids Mangos, raw
Vitamin A 0mcg 54mcg
Vitamin C 0mg 36.4mg
Vitamin E 0mg 0.9mg
Vitamin K 0mcg 4.2mcg
Thiamin (B1) 0.0mg 0.0mg
Riboflavin (B2) 0.1mg 0.0mg
Niacin (B3) 13.3mg 0.7mg
Vitamin B6 0.3mg 0.1mg
Folate 4mcg 43mcg
Vitamin B12 3.0mcg 0mcg

Mineral Comparison

Mineral Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids Mangos, raw
Calcium 11mg 11mg
Iron 1.5mg 0.2mg
Magnesium 27mg 10mg
Phosphorus 163mg 14mg
Potassium 237mg 168mg
Zinc 0.8mg 0.1mg
Selenium 80.4mcg 0.6mcg

概览

Mangos, raw is lower in calories. Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids has more protein. Overall, Mangos, raw wins in 7 of 9 categories.

More comparisons with Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids

More comparisons with Mangos, raw

Nutritional Disclaimer

This content is for educational and informational purposes only. Nutritional values may vary based on preparation method, portion size, and product brand. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized dietary advice.

Data sources: USDA FoodData Central, Korea MFDS, Japan MEXT.

Compare Other Foods

vs