Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds vs Candies, sugar-coated almonds

Nutrition comparison per 100g serving

Macronutrient Comparison

Nutrient Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds Candies, sugar-coated almonds Winner
Calories 573 kcal 465 kcal
Total Fat 37.1g 17.9g
Saturated Fat 11.7g 1.9g
Cholesterol 0mg 0mg =
Sodium 9mg 13mg
Total Carbohydrates 50.2g 68.3g
Dietary Fiber 10.4g 2.5g
Sugars 26.9g 62.5g
Protein 9.5g 10g

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds Candies, sugar-coated almonds
Vitamin C 27.3mg 0mg
Vitamin E 4.8mg 12.4mg
Thiamin (B1) 0mg 0.1mg
Riboflavin (B2) 0mg 0.3mg
Niacin (B3) 0mg 1mg
Vitamin B6 0.7mg 0.1mg
Folate 0mcg 15mcg
Vitamin B12 2.1mcg 0mcg

Mineral Comparison

Mineral Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds Candies, sugar-coated almonds
Calcium 840mg 100mg
Iron 3.6mg 1.9mg
Magnesium 0mg 137mg
Phosphorus 0mg 166mg
Potassium 0mg 255mg
Zinc 0mg 1.6mg
Selenium 0mcg 1.7mcg

Zusammenfassung

Candies, sugar-coated almonds is lower in calories. Candies, sugar-coated almonds has more protein. Overall, Candies, sugar-coated almonds wins in 5 of 8 categories.

More comparisons with Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, COCOAVIA Chocolate Covered Almonds

More comparisons with Candies, sugar-coated almonds

Nutritional Disclaimer

This content is for educational and informational purposes only. Nutritional values may vary based on preparation method, portion size, and product brand. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized dietary advice.

Data sources: USDA FoodData Central, Korea MFDS, Japan MEXT.

Compare Other Foods

vs