Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids vs Potatoes, flesh and skin, raw

Nutrition comparison per 100g serving

Macronutrient Comparison

Nutrient Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids Potatoes, flesh and skin, raw Winner
Calories 116 kcal 77 kcal
Total Fat 0.8g 0.1g
Saturated Fat 0.2g 0.0g
Cholesterol 30mg 0mg
Sodium 50mg 6mg
Total Carbohydrates 0g 17.5g
Dietary Fiber 0g 2.1g
Sugars 0g 0.8g
Protein 25.5g 2.0g

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids Potatoes, flesh and skin, raw
Vitamin C 0mg 19.7mg
Vitamin E 0mg 0.0mg
Vitamin K 0mcg 2mcg
Thiamin (B1) 0.0mg 0.1mg
Riboflavin (B2) 0.1mg 0.0mg
Niacin (B3) 13.3mg 1.1mg
Vitamin B6 0.3mg 0.3mg
Folate 4mcg 15mcg
Vitamin B12 3.0mcg 0mcg

Mineral Comparison

Mineral Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids Potatoes, flesh and skin, raw
Calcium 11mg 12mg
Iron 1.5mg 0.8mg
Magnesium 27mg 23mg
Phosphorus 163mg 57mg
Potassium 237mg 425mg
Zinc 0.8mg 0.3mg
Selenium 80.4mcg 0.4mcg

Resumen

Potatoes, flesh and skin, raw is lower in calories. Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids has more protein. Overall, Potatoes, flesh and skin, raw wins in 7 of 9 categories.

More comparisons with Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids

More comparisons with Potatoes, flesh and skin, raw

Nutritional Disclaimer

This content is for educational and informational purposes only. Nutritional values may vary based on preparation method, portion size, and product brand. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized dietary advice.

Data sources: USDA FoodData Central, Korea MFDS, Japan MEXT.

Compare Other Foods

vs