Fat, turkey vs Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked

Nutrition comparison per 100g serving

Macronutrient Comparison

Nutrient Fat, turkey Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked Winner
Calories 900 kcal 226 kcal
Total Fat 99.8g 17.6g
Saturated Fat 29.4g 6.2g
Cholesterol 102mg 70mg
Sodium 0mg 1200mg
Total Carbohydrates 0g 3.9g
Dietary Fiber 0g 0g =
Sugars 0g 0g =
Protein 0g 13.1g

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin Fat, turkey Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked
Vitamin C 0mg 14.8mg
Vitamin D 4.8mcg 0mcg
Vitamin E 2.9mg 0mg

Mineral Comparison

Mineral Fat, turkey Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked
Iron 0mg 1.2mg
Selenium 0.2mcg 0mcg

Resumen

Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked is lower in calories. Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked has more protein. Overall, Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked wins in 6 of 7 categories.

More comparisons with Fat, turkey

More comparisons with Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked

Nutritional Disclaimer

This content is for educational and informational purposes only. Nutritional values may vary based on preparation method, portion size, and product brand. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized dietary advice.

Data sources: USDA FoodData Central, Korea MFDS, Japan MEXT.

Compare Other Foods

vs