Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids vs New Zealand spinach, raw

Nutrition comparison per 100g serving

Macronutrient Comparison

Nutrient Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids New Zealand spinach, raw Winner
Calories 116 kcal 14 kcal
Total Fat 0.8g 0.2g
Saturated Fat 0.2g 0.0g
Cholesterol 30mg 0mg
Sodium 50mg 130mg
Total Carbohydrates 0g 2.5g
Dietary Fiber 0g 1.5g
Sugars 0g 0.3g
Protein 25.5g 1.5g

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids New Zealand spinach, raw
Vitamin C 0mg 30mg
Vitamin E 0mg 1.4mg
Vitamin K 0mcg 337mcg
Thiamin (B1) 0.0mg 0.0mg
Riboflavin (B2) 0.1mg 0.1mg
Niacin (B3) 13.3mg 0.5mg
Vitamin B6 0.3mg 0.3mg
Folate 4mcg 15mcg
Vitamin B12 3.0mcg 0mcg

Mineral Comparison

Mineral Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids New Zealand spinach, raw
Calcium 11mg 58mg
Iron 1.5mg 0.8mg
Magnesium 27mg 39mg
Phosphorus 163mg 28mg
Potassium 237mg 130mg
Zinc 0.8mg 0.4mg
Selenium 80.4mcg 0.7mcg

Sumário

New Zealand spinach, raw is lower in calories. Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids has more protein. Overall, New Zealand spinach, raw wins in 6 of 9 categories.

More comparisons with Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids

More comparisons with New Zealand spinach, raw

Nutritional Disclaimer

This content is for educational and informational purposes only. Nutritional values may vary based on preparation method, portion size, and product brand. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized dietary advice.

Data sources: USDA FoodData Central, Korea MFDS, Japan MEXT.

Compare Other Foods

vs