Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw vs Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g serving

Macronutrient Comparison

Nutrient Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt Winner
Calories 69 kcal 130 kcal
Total Fat 0.2g 0.3g
Saturated Fat 0.1g 0.1g
Cholesterol 0mg 0mg =
Sodium 2mg 382mg
Total Carbohydrates 18.1g 28.2g
Dietary Fiber 0.9g 0.4g
Sugars 15.5g 0.1g
Protein 0.7g 2.7g

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
Vitamin A 3mcg 0mcg
Vitamin C 3.2mg 0mg
Vitamin E 0.2mg 0.0mg
Vitamin K 14.6mcg 0mcg
Thiamin (B1) 0.1mg 0.0mg
Riboflavin (B2) 0.1mg 0.0mg
Niacin (B3) 0.2mg 0.4mg
Vitamin B6 0.1mg 0.1mg
Folate 2mcg 3mcg

Mineral Comparison

Mineral Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
Calcium 10mg 10mg
Iron 0.4mg 0.2mg
Magnesium 7mg 12mg
Phosphorus 20mg 43mg
Potassium 191mg 35mg
Zinc 0.1mg 0.5mg
Selenium 0.1mcg 7.5mcg

Ringkasan

Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw is lower in calories. Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has more protein. Overall, Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw wins in 5 of 8 categories.

More comparisons with Grapes, red or green (European type, such as Thompson seedless), raw

More comparisons with Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt

Nutritional Disclaimer

This content is for educational and informational purposes only. Nutritional values may vary based on preparation method, portion size, and product brand. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized dietary advice.

Data sources: USDA FoodData Central, Korea MFDS, Japan MEXT.

Compare Other Foods

vs