Broccoli, raw vs Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids

Nutrition comparison per 100g serving

Macronutrient Comparison

Nutrient Broccoli, raw Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids Winner
Calories 34 kcal 116 kcal
Total Fat 0.4g 0.8g
Saturated Fat 0.1g 0.2g
Cholesterol 0mg 30mg
Sodium 33mg 50mg
Total Carbohydrates 6.6g 0g
Dietary Fiber 2.6g 0g
Sugars 1.7g 0g
Protein 2.8g 25.5g

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin Broccoli, raw Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids
Vitamin A 31mcg 0mcg
Vitamin C 89.2mg 0mg
Vitamin E 0.8mg 0mg
Vitamin K 102mcg 0mcg
Thiamin (B1) 0.1mg 0.0mg
Riboflavin (B2) 0.1mg 0.1mg
Niacin (B3) 0.6mg 13.3mg
Vitamin B6 0.2mg 0.3mg
Folate 63mcg 4mcg
Vitamin B12 0mcg 3.0mcg

Mineral Comparison

Mineral Broccoli, raw Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids
Calcium 47mg 11mg
Iron 0.7mg 1.5mg
Magnesium 21mg 27mg
Phosphorus 66mg 163mg
Potassium 316mg 237mg
Zinc 0.4mg 0.8mg
Selenium 2.5mcg 80.4mcg

Ringkasan

Broccoli, raw is lower in calories. Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids has more protein. Overall, Broccoli, raw wins in 7 of 9 categories.

More comparisons with Broccoli, raw

More comparisons with Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids

Nutritional Disclaimer

This content is for educational and informational purposes only. Nutritional values may vary based on preparation method, portion size, and product brand. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized dietary advice.

Data sources: USDA FoodData Central, Korea MFDS, Japan MEXT.

Compare Other Foods

vs