Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, drained solids (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) vs Mangos, raw

Nutrition comparison per 100g serving

Macronutrient Comparison

Nutrient Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, drained solids (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) Mangos, raw Winner
Calories 86 kcal 60 kcal
Total Fat 1.0g 0.4g
Saturated Fat 0.2g 0.1g
Cholesterol 36mg 0mg
Sodium 247mg 1mg
Total Carbohydrates 0g 15g
Dietary Fiber 0g 1.6g
Sugars 0g 13.7g
Protein 19.4g 0.8g

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, drained solids (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) Mangos, raw
Vitamin A 17mcg 54mcg
Vitamin C 0mg 36.4mg
Vitamin D 1.2mcg 0mcg
Vitamin E 0.3mg 0.9mg
Vitamin K 0.2mcg 4.2mcg
Thiamin (B1) 0.0mg 0.0mg
Riboflavin (B2) 0.1mg 0.0mg
Niacin (B3) 10.1mg 0.7mg
Vitamin B6 0.3mg 0.1mg
Folate 4mcg 43mcg
Vitamin B12 2.5mcg 0mcg

Mineral Comparison

Mineral Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, drained solids (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) Mangos, raw
Calcium 17mg 11mg
Iron 1.6mg 0.2mg
Magnesium 23mg 10mg
Phosphorus 139mg 14mg
Potassium 179mg 168mg
Zinc 0.7mg 0.1mg
Selenium 70.6mcg 0.6mcg

Résumé

Mangos, raw is lower in calories. Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, drained solids (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program) has more protein. Overall, Mangos, raw wins in 7 of 9 categories.

More comparisons with Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, drained solids (Includes foods for USDA's Food Distribution Program)

More comparisons with Mangos, raw

Nutritional Disclaimer

This content is for educational and informational purposes only. Nutritional values may vary based on preparation method, portion size, and product brand. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized dietary advice.

Data sources: USDA FoodData Central, Korea MFDS, Japan MEXT.

Compare Other Foods

vs