Frankfurter, beef, pork, and turkey, fat free vs Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round average

Nutrition comparison per 100g serving

Macronutrient Comparison

Nutrient Frankfurter, beef, pork, and turkey, fat free Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round average Winner
Calories 109 kcal 18 kcal
Total Fat 1.6g 0.2g
Saturated Fat 0.5g 0.0g
Cholesterol 41mg 0mg
Sodium 880mg 5mg
Total Carbohydrates 11.2g 3.9g
Dietary Fiber 0g 1.2g
Sugars 0g 2.6g
Protein 12.5g 0.9g

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin Frankfurter, beef, pork, and turkey, fat free Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round average
Vitamin A 0mcg 42mcg
Vitamin C 24mg 13.7mg
Vitamin D 0.1mcg 0mcg
Vitamin E 0mg 0.5mg
Vitamin K 1.8mcg 7.9mcg
Thiamin (B1) 0.2mg 0.0mg
Riboflavin (B2) 0.2mg 0.0mg
Niacin (B3) 3.5mg 0.6mg
Vitamin B6 0.2mg 0.1mg
Folate 6mcg 15mcg
Vitamin B12 1.1mcg 0mcg

Mineral Comparison

Mineral Frankfurter, beef, pork, and turkey, fat free Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round average
Calcium 54mg 10mg
Iron 1.8mg 0.3mg
Magnesium 14mg 11mg
Phosphorus 132mg 24mg
Potassium 220mg 237mg
Zinc 2.9mg 0.2mg
Selenium 18.7mcg 0mcg

Summary

Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round average is lower in calories. Frankfurter, beef, pork, and turkey, fat free has more protein. Overall, Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round average wins in 6 of 9 categories.

More comparisons with Frankfurter, beef, pork, and turkey, fat free

More comparisons with Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round average

Nutritional Disclaimer

This content is for educational and informational purposes only. Nutritional values may vary based on preparation method, portion size, and product brand. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider or registered dietitian for personalized dietary advice.

Data sources: USDA FoodData Central, Korea MFDS, Japan MEXT.

Compare Other Foods

vs